Webinar Wrap-Up: Research Roundup
…the average score on this item is rather high, when working with leaders, you may want to start asking questions about this item if you see a score lower than…
…the average score on this item is rather high, when working with leaders, you may want to start asking questions about this item if you see a score lower than…
…design. What exactly do we want to measure and how do we write an item that measures it? In our use of the term “fair” it refers to ensuring everyone…
…manipulation: Items are not transparently linked to the constructs being measured. Items are written in neutral language that is not easily associated with positive or negative qualities. MRG’s semi-ipsative questionnaire…
…of leaders since before the pandemic. Unfortunately, because the item was added during the pandemic, and after many leaders were forced to work remotely, we cannot yet distinguish the behaviors…
…help individuals target specific behaviors for development). Use the context and resources to identify key action items that are highly specific, and create structure (tasks, deadlines) to make them happen….
…to connect 1:1. They have some interesting ideas on their blog: https://wistia.com/blog/categories/making-video A few things I’d suggest exploring as a beginner are: Video voicemails: just use your webcam or your…
…validating first and then offering constructive suggestions and sharing your experience so that they can learn. Q: Can you explain the difference between LEA behaviors and LEA effectiveness measures? https://mrg-assessments.wistia.com/medias/7tiroxfsd4?embedType=iframe&videoFoam=true&videoWidth=600 …
…You mentioned motivation is correlated with enjoyment in a role, not necessarily effectiveness in a role. Can you expand on that? A: Video answer from Drew: https://youtu.be/dyh2s00XN5A Q: You talked…
…in this study, the LEA 360 includes an item that measures observer perceptions of future potential. This allows us to identify which leaders are seen as having the potential to…
…is great news from a research design perspective, because it means that participants who were more likely to exaggerate were not responding to the self-confidence item any differently than participants…